Saturday, May 29, 2010

Cancer-leo Cuspman In Love

This being avant-garde means, David Antin









Come quickly for once /

no, not the time to read /

ago smugglers around us / women and men who know the routes we take and which we suggest paths forward /

This will form it should have / this will be good or it will be bad /

The left continues its race

//////////// //////////////////

So, so smugglers are books and books that are smugglers

No route is diverted, all lead to Rome or Al Andalus

There was a gay community in Al-Andalus completely integrated into the life of the city

his wives, his men and ladyboys could be hundreds of miles to hear a musician

Earth is everyone

The Earth is a music room

/////////////////////////////

I'm not writing I'm not talking only

a community of men and books inhabit my days

you learn the legends that inhabit

I know the origin of your surname and who your ancestors

it was when Levy-Strauss died

the poet white bows to the griot,

the most corrupt of them are currently spin doctors

/////////////////////////////

not the wine was not a Omar Khayyam poetic image in

drink reciting his quatrains you see somebody

friend knows it Persian?

/////////////////////////////

/////////////////////////////


I'll talk about this being a pre- guard means david antin

sometimes I'll put names to uppercase letters and the beginning of sentences

sometimes not

Nijinsky in his diary put god in lower case and upper case his mentor Diaghilev

- - no, I do not like the term avant-garde, too

because I made the army

but david antin is grammarian

there were also poets grammarians to al-Andalusian

all poets and grammarians

behind what being avant-garde means,

there is the book Bourdieu, the sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, what speaking means that is a book about how men talk among themselves

what being avant-garde means is a poetic essay and a book of poetic

a masterful book published two years ago by the presses the real dijon

/////////////////////////////

david antin is an American poet who lives in california

he was directly influenced by the poetry of john cage, including silence, which is a book of poetry, before being a book on music

David Antin did not invent the talk poems

there was talk of poems since man was able to speak

and one can imagine that the Neanderthal man was the poetry

he had his own verbal jousting, the own slam, his own hain-teny

also died when an old man was a library burning

how
yes how many libraries have they burned since time immemorial?

how many men lost memories of hearts?

/////////////////////////////

the talk poem is a poem that david antin done when the Calls for a performance

antin seeks above all things the public to know that he will find the place in which his performance will take place, the history of the place so small it is, life, life as it passes through when he speaks, will talk, talk

it seeks to understand the context in which he performs as a griot, such

a griot, yes, no, but

a griot for whom the names of men their names and identity raise questions

we could talk to his place an anti-griot

antin does not say: I'll tell you who you are where you come from what is your legend

antin as griot undermines the names of men whom he tells a story or history

calls into question the notion of identity as it was over today and yesterday is a foregone conclusion for ages

This being avant-garde is also ontology

Antin and should written? Antin or (Antin)

///////////////////////////////

magic power of the name : Mallarmé spoke about in his book

when they call me, I turn around, and you

?

//////////////////////////////

and you?

//////////////////////////////

three points of this being avant-garde means , I will address:

1 - considered the poem as a time to live, so a fleeting moment. The poem as ephemeris, counting the days and hours

2 - the question of identity, such as setting up a story that everyone is built for himself: the cost of living

3 - poems that talk can become a horizon to the poetry of David Antin: the establishment of a poetic relational (in the clinical setting or intimate)

//////////// //////////////////

1 - The poem goes like spoken word or a current of air

/

I said that the poetic essay david antin was intertext, as its title suggests, the work of Bourdieu This means that talking

- In this book very briefly, Bourdieu shows how human interaction works from communication frameworks inherent in our societies and our cultures

bourdieu shows, among other things, that there may be a sociostylistique at work, even in the daily speech, that speech of a man or more could demonstrate a uniqueness that makes poetic

for antin sociopoetics so there is at work in every man, whatever

some minor some major

one side of the poet Villon another critic Nisard

only sociopoetics this, so it keeps its specificity, must, if it is registered, that is transcribed into a book, this sociopoetics, therefore, must find an entry closest to scoring as the literary writing as the

book should comply with the oral form and not vice versa

a book depository or deposit

each time each man every breath

white is a pause or silence

yes, but also that the book or the work is no longer book or work

if the sense of beauty should be, what feeling, aesthetics, must remain an impression,

fleeting and not immortal

/

john cage silence speaks of music as beautiful as fresh milk, because living, he said

that music, like poetry , should not be stopped in its flow by conservative means,

or the sound of a truck is also 'm a music school or beethoven

and antin, students from a school of art, art institute memphis:

"so I can understand why you want to make something that will stand again and again to experience / something that will deliver to each meeting, and perhaps for a long time / quite a set of related experiences can be rich and mysterious and new / and I sympathize with this desire / but somehow this desire has come to merge / as you obviously know / with the idea of how long an object could well last / and we could really make history this lust objects that could last forever / and it's not for nothing that a Roman poet talkative wanted to boast that his speech would survive the monuments of marble and bronze / and many years later william shakespeare / who had read the Roman poet to school and wrote a lively little bi / has taken heart at the idea that some sixteen hundred years later / at the option of many accidents education and transmission / he read the Roman poet and yet he was pushed to bring this great bluster and about a repeat of his own poems "

/

speech is no longer what it should be archived, no longer speak through the ages

john cage at home becomes a mandala that is not erased

antin is not Zen or Fluxus, but because there is, in humans, other ways of conceiving time

and that these modes of design time, even though they are idiosyncratic, are also respectable that the procedures put in place enunciation in writing so-called classical

and, confronted with the scripture known at this time of writing or legend, antin with a small a, or? Antin opposes an anecdote that shows his old mother suffering from Alzheimer's disease. meet the laurels of a Shakespeare or a broom, antin between time forever lost, the memory that tapers and frayed, the lost memories, amnesia of his mother,

and what would been pathetic in the mouth of another man becomes Antinea magnitude

yes, life has not a single time, but time

and each time the man has a right to equal dignity and the same honors

every man is a poet

/////////////////////////////////////

2 - The question of identity: the cost of living

/

there is no memory and memory + - + no time and time -

face of death, nothing lasts, everything has the right to equal dignity

antin has its mourning the feeling of eternity that probably still works one or another of us

equal dignity for all and all

no idiosyncrasy + or -

no singularity that takes, persists in time

not an idiot, or engineering

antin speaks thus anecdote from his anecdotes, according to context and audience

it will, for example, a talk poem where he describes his decision to come live in san diego, to come and teach at of retirement, one of his friends, Professor at NY and poetry critic.

here there is a gift, a poetic form of hospitality: your life will make a fresh start, you were a professor at New York and now you're retired. I come from big apple, and I chose to live in san diego to teach.

and he will talk about his stepfather, a Hungarian painter and poet who has never been successful because of unfavorable circumstances and the way things are certain events,

fold men.

/

This replaces the page is the circumstance, the context in which the poetic gift sets. For this to occur poetic gift, you must have, according to Antin, knowledge forms sociopoetics that a particular individual who uses up his story.

gold, each man has a clean story, according to him, this story form the deep structure of the individuality of such and such.

so there is not a single ontology, but several

responsible, there are as many ontologies as there are men.

/

the poet is he who finds the story that every man is met

is talk in the price poem that the poet reveals his method.

/

a - man is an open book: his ego is rooted in the story, a name as a key to our identity and a Mana , ie, as in the sociology of communication Erving Goffman, a way to save face, to hold its face and that of others:

"in other words / we all have a name / our names and we know we stand behind them and respond to the call for a coherent / we do a sense of who we are and what we are made and what is alien to us / and we do not have this idea we would if we had not had a series of experiments have convinced us that we were the person who made it or failed to do that or wanted to do it or was afraid to do it / and when you think about / I concluded that the reason why I use so many stories that I think is that the self / whatever definition / is produced entirely by the collision between a sense of identity and issues of narrative "

/

b - the man who shaped the narrative structure of his ego from a nodal point

there not only the rituals of interaction between myself and others, but the rites of interaction from me to me. The aim of these rituals is that keeping our individuality intact and preserved from the accidents of life.

in this sense, every man has a nodal point is a threshold beyond which it can not go, or risk losing its identity. this nodal point is what form his own style.

and can be read in a man as in a book, if one has identified its nodal point, namely that it is capable of doing and what he can not.

this node was not given to men at first, but depends on the life and accidents that each man meets in his way. these accidents are the vault which is built on his personality, and this vault admits or denies a certain degree and / or some form of transformation:

"... the story is a kind of psychic function / which is part Economic and human psychic is probably a universal feature of humanity /

anyway we associate what is human / and it involves a peculiar and paradoxical confrontation

imagine yourself confronted with the possibility of / processing / thinking of a mind with thoughts on any subject / to a human sentient / even be a very basic

at some point this meeting can be the probability of a transformation / maybe this is a disaster perhaps it is wonderful / but in any case anything that undergoes transformation is not the same / and there is always the threat that any being who is to undergo a transformation does not maintain during such a process and ceases to be under the impact of this transformation "

/

here david antin opposes the concept of narrative to that history.
.
according to him, history presents a series of events experienced by a person, not a character, a being of paper, but a person, a life.
.
and I feel that at the time of the storytelling and the spin-doctor, thought little bourgeoise will raise its shields "to stick with fiction, literary!" yes, poetry well confined in its niche, in this case ... it reads, it writes well gentimment in its niche.
pass.
.
and history, from the narrative, is what does not radically change a person, what makes a person remains what it is, while the story has an accident that changes the me.
.
well, take, yes, taking the life of Henry Miller, his arrival in Paris with june, after New York. Well, the life of Henry Miller does not change radically, Miller remains the same, up to 80 years, despite the madness that has taken to become a writer, costs. Life of Henry Miller, is the picaresque novel, Henry Miller, is a picaresque hero. nothing changes the inner self of this hobo heaven, he can know the worst insults, most fall into disarray, find themselves caught in a guépied, he acquits himself well as Ulysses. the exact opposite, the antithesis of Miller, Italo Svevo with a mediocre life, succeeds in nothing but fun for what it is.
.
the story is changing the nodal point, the horrible accident or road to Damascus. it is man who sees death in the face and died on the exchange. is the plane of joseph Beuys, who crashed in the Crimea, the disease takes hold of young native and will make him a medicine man. noting that Oedipus killed his father and married his mother is another story. or the moment of my death Blanchot, Blanchot tells how he escaped his own shooting by the Nazis at the end of the war:
"remained, however, when the shooting was more than expectation, the feeling of lightness that I can not translate: freedom from life? infinity which opens? Neither happiness nor unhappiness. Neither the absence of fear and perhaps already not beyond. I know, I imagine that feeling unanalyzable changed what was left of life. As if death beside himself that could now face death by him. "I am alive. No, you're dead."
.
it operates a transformation of the whole person, it can operate some form of attaraxie in life and writing of a man, like hare, but it can also not be seen, not be as tragic as the "reader" wants: something, some event took place at a given moment, a brief is absolutely unprintable, even Proximity to a newspaper, and this thing, or because too faint for be said without smiling, caused a metamorphosis.
.
and candy, a colleague of David Antin. antin talking about candy during a performance he has done in an institute of poetry in San Francisco in 1973 ("What am I doing here?", in spoken Poems, ed. Notebooks breakers, Clamecy: 1984). What we said Antinea candy? What was his life? who was she? what she was doing work with antin? everything the poet tells us is this: a kind of candy is courageous mother who lives alone, without a husband, and is often forced to go to the police because of his children. some candy talking antin both its work and disappointments in love antin listening.
.
some people around us, go to confession more easily than others. it seems to them that their life itself must be transparent to people who are part of daily life and reflect a kind of innocence in human relations, or some sympathetic relationships are forged between neighbors, acquaintances and colleagues and certain actions that are part of the intimate, are disclosed without brake. So, talking about a candy's disappointments in love antin and excludes antin why not candy it reveals such a case: her latest lover had three cherries tattooed on her tail, why the candy was thrown out of her bed. - Why candy says it this? then wonders antin poem during his talk. Why? history, as it is given to us, seems so sordid and at the same time, if preposterous Antinea seems ashamed to give the same meaning and value of history. as if life is playing tricks on us and the fate of each of us could not match what is usually expected of a story.
.
verisimilitude.
.
the physical form of a man or the shape of his life does not match our expectations, the trick is taking a life off the beaten track as you approach it.
.
can naturally talk about the experience has lived blanchot limit at the end of World War II, his death sentence is at the same time, his sentence of life can be the exegesis of the tragedy hare, and it may also be that the tragedy of candy. But in our Western thinking which box will she-life candy, unable to choose a man with "a head on your shoulders? in which box, the life of a woman unable to choose a man who is not at the same time, a child and a man whereas her sex, as his libido is not only a "cherry"?!
.
according antin, fold, or node, has hare lived during the shooting and that he has escaped, is as tragic and as baroque as the crease which made that a candy was recognized shocking story, the point of wanting, or duty, to tell this story antin. for the poet, the exegesis that we can bring the experience has not lived blanchot more literary and philosophical, is no more worthwhile than, that faced candy, is psychological or clinical. Each man has a story he has internalized and which reveals itself and each story is no more noble, worthy or unworthy than another. It is the specificity of a particular story that the poet has to find its literariness, his own strangeness: his ego.
.
( to follow)






Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Macular Degeneration Best Aids

The Random Syndicate

The Random Syndicate

Last outstanding shares poetic past, present and future

Study and prospective new events

Cabinet of Curiosities

Pretty Things

HOAX

Random

*

THE RANDOM SYNDICATE this

Nourine Said the poet to the release of his book Unless some excess.


Playing Quatrains

the Sufi poet Omar Khayyam:

"You who do not drink wine, do not blame it for the drunks, because I am ready to renounce God 's He ordered me to give up wine.

You boast of not drinking, but that glory unbecoming who commits acts a hundred times more reprehensible than drunkenness. "

For our agape, poets, musicians and bottles of wine are welcome.

On Friday, May 28, 2010 at 20 h 00, Koza Nude gallery.

Nude Gallery Koza,

16 Rue Charlie Chaplin,

neighborhood of Little Citeaux

21000 Dijon.

06.84.59.83.39

Thursday, April 22, 2010

How To Write Short Film Treatment Samples

Merci Marcion

(September 09, 3 pages)


1) The community prior
Even if you had one day, for whatever reasons, give up looking the truth, you can never give up say. But stranger still, what you say so do not be so different from what you have said if you had continued in the first channel. There is something to understand a convergence possible between you and your say on the one hand, and the unknowable, the impalpable, imperceptible and the unspeakable, on the other.

Know of a new type, namely foreign to our usual communication. Not that he makes a premeditated, ethical or political, to communicate otherwise, not that he would be a secret not to fit in all ears. Its origin and destination are simply not - the international mean.
In this other space (the inter-say), the "truth" explodes, giving way to know-believe, to believe (including think-be) and believe each person in the world and of all. The criterion is a kind effectiveness of each of these modes. For example, if a man does what he does is he has to believe - and believe it be - relevant. (1) No glue perfectly to its action. His expertise is not only (in) causes a certain mode of presence (self, made the gesture and worldliness) is also evident. (2)
This other space, fed the terms of the verb to believe instead of knowledge and truth is one from which we observe without participating. Observe human communication without personally participating in human communication is mutually exclusive itself readily to know everything, of all trade.

This know-there, if any, is not marketable .

A religious community: a communication system among others. A small system in the large. We find here as elsewhere an interior and exterior. External communication, for example what is said about the faith to a man in love with science. He talks like an alien-of-the-faith. Inside, on the contrary, it is "us", that is to say something important - the largest free doubt - is tacit. A secret bond, implied, that we're here together. We do not talk like we talk to a stranger coming knocking at our door. (We do not talk like a child talking to an adult). This foreigner would face some strange questions which you smile. One would think so, and he would know that if he asks because he does not know ...

But I said I did not want to remain so, abroad?

If the truth had not been previously excluded from my speech Now, we think rightly that the scientific discipline called systemic (I think) deals specifically with communication issues. But as the systemic science is addressed does not also to the wider community? This community is not she previously consists of all these men, scholars and laymen, who want to know the truth and nothing but the truth? Even teaching the system to an audience of ignorant, it is still "us".
What is this implicit Community bringing together such a speaker and people curious of systems? Between them, they do not say the outside perspective to knowledge about the community gathered around the knowledge of the institution know - and for good reason! But we do say no more communication that exists within the community. What is it? I am trying to say: just as my interest here for the system requires of me to believe some-being even before I learned anything - just my ultimate satisfaction of having learned and understood complete draw the contours of my being (maybe I am) as belonging to the community. As it was written in advance. In general, the art community to desire knowledge (desire forged by each community) stands out as an individual and collective ontology. So obvious, preexisting individuals we are, an operating system of the world community by advance. With know it (was) moved, it prevents anyone from discovering a general economy of the verb believe, synonymous with being in the world (knowledge economy-believe, of belief make-believe and think- be) which otherwise involve all of us. (Plus he knows, the more it moves away):

To know, one must first be .

But then, in these conditions, knowledge is not what everyone (in the community) believes: an opportunity, freedom, more soul to be offered, it , which would, as he naively believes, "facing the world." Only together, as everyone is not facing the world, it is open to everyone to know, that is to say, to believe that this individual is free ... facing the world.

is as he is not alone in facing the world
Let him know face the world.

This knowledge of another type which I had the feeling place and our man in front of his belief, believing that "before the know as being" offered him by the community. The individual is that it immediately find a bit panicked, he discovers he has to cope, men - but this time in the world as being incapable of knowing anything, except now by a kind of cowardice, a lack of courage ... (3)

-*-


2) A sky for two
If at least one question above all else (object, thought or event ), then the causality is the law of the universe. If causality is the law of the universe, then the whole universe is, perhaps a root cause (if not just a handful). Whoever has the power to sow the same root cause in another world than ours, but similar to ours in its origin, it reset it immediately the same sequence of events than those produced on earth. (We would have a place to go back)

If the world was returning back a few minutes or a few centuries
He traveled the same path, would reproduce the same story, exactly.

But then, this means that if a good god created the world, its goodness consists only in the fact of having created. Soon the world was born, this is indeed the Laws (which craves human reason) who have taken over. Also, the sequence of events (eg human history) it is not the business of God. No "divine providence," no other possible purpose of the creator god of letting the world be like going ... Even supposing that the god who created the earth created by the same occasion the Laws that govern the events, he will have these fixed and eternal laws - as seen.
What does the cosmology of the ancient Greeks? They wanted to imitate on earth the order and harmony that prevailed in their view in the sky. So what did the stars that did not land men? They were fixed , they suffered no change. They were the very image of eternity .

This does not inspire you does nothing? The men of old sought a fixed reference point, a zero on a scale, one thing is certain, a lever on which to settle the affairs of men. They certainly atonement god, but they relied more on knowledge of its laws.

A single sky for God and human destiny.


-*-

3) A god without a history
I'd rather be facing the world, to die and be reborn in every moment. Cosmology, genealogy, theology ... basically, the god of history is that human communication. I would prefer a home without god, without fame, without evidence - a god at all times. It whispered in my ear, it might be good . This man who is said he created the earth can be (good), because no good god can reign on this earth if everything is according to fixed laws and eternal (what we know confirms ). What would he have to tell me in the ear except that it is just the god ?

"Love your fate, it is fair to be so
Even if all this escapes you!

The "divine providence" to which I was asked to believe because no one knows the final end, it is only the justice of these laws that apply everywhere and in all things with the same indifference equity. Justice absurd and blind! Improper inevitably cause produces its effect! Good and bad, only the strongest, most cunning wins. If one knows right reason the world (rational causality) and it is believed possible kindness, then human freedom to believe in a creator god both right and good is that the victim consents, if the god's request, to forgive him:

Good god who would attempt to redeem himself with men
- to'avoir created this world!

I do not see how he could not contradict both his justice and eternity. I prefer to imagine that another god, stranger to this world , inspires his turn after the goodness of God here have made me understand his justice. In my worst days, when I swear that this world is bad, my freedom comes to my aid, that to disagree with me in my turn, not by some faith shared by a community, but by the gratuitous goodness that Here and there one of us can still exercise. If any action , no matter how small, is good, then the world is not all bad.

It is just so that goodness is beyond the law:
Free .





____________ (1) He thinks he is this or that he "believes it" as appropriate.
(2) To believe is being shown in the episode "Bad faith" described by Sartre.
(3) That should please the followers of the faith. But do not rejoice too soon, you who think this way: your faith when it seeks to enlist others, is that knowledge for yourself that you can not prove.


-*-